The Essential Role of Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) in Complementing Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

The Essential Role of Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) in Complementing Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

‍

In the complex landscape of software development, ensuring robust security measures is paramount. Static Application Security Testing (SAST) has been a long-standing player in this field, known for its speed and efficiency in identifying potential vulnerabilities. However, the advent of Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) shifts the paradigm, offering capabilities that not only address the limitations of SAST but also springboard additional strengths to the terrain. This exploration delves into why incorporating DAST alongside SAST is crucial  (and perhaps more advantageous) for a comprehensive security strategy.

‍

The Inherent Limitations of SAST

SAST, a tool for early detection of vulnerabilities in code, operates on a static analysis mode, not in runtime. This method, while efficient in scanning codebases, encounters several hurdles. One of the primary limitations is its inability to fully understand vulnerabilities that involve interactions between multiple applications or those spread across various files. Its analytical scope restricts its vision and cannot effectively track complex function paths in such scenarios.

Another significant shortfall of SAST looms in its ineffectiveness in dealing with external inputs, particularly unverified or unvalidated data from third-party APIs. Absent in any direct code, SAST has no idea what harmful feedback could come from such sources. This gap leaves a blind spot in security assessments of modern distributed microservice applications which increasingly rely on external data sources. Additionally, SAST tools often face compatibility issues when identifying newer frameworks.  For example, industry SAST leaders often need to add support one at a time for new frameworks and often cannot support popular frameworks (such as React JS), limiting the SAST tools’ applicability in diverse development environments.

Perhaps the most frustrating shortfall is that SAST only identifies "potential" threats. By the very definition of the static element within SAST, it cannot confirm the actual existence of a vulnerability. This limitation often leads to a higher rate of false positives, burdening development teams with the task of sifting through potential issues that may not pose real threats. This is costly and more than offsets the speed advantage of the SAST scans themselves.

Essentially, SAST serves primarily as a linting and format-checking tool, suitable for basic code scanning but not equipped for deeper security analyses.  The sole use of SAST, unfortunately, only serves as a small check and deterrent for the attack surface; most likely, the security of the code is still at high risk.

‍

The Comprehensive Advantages of DAST

DAST emerges as a solution to the constraints of SAST, offering a dynamic approach to security testing. Unlike SAST, DAST proves the existence of vulnerabilities by simulating real-world attacks on running applications. This hands-on automated approach not only identifies security gaps but also demonstrates their practical implications, providing invaluable insights for developers.

One of the most compelling features of DAST is its ability to work seamlessly with any framework, including those like React JS, where SAST falls short. By interacting directly with the live running web application, DAST overcomes the limitations related to framework compatibility and file structures.  With a live app, all functional flows and external data can be present and witnessed in logging output or web responses. Its comprehensive coverage extends to all aspects of the application, including interactions with external APIs, offering a complete view of an applications security landscape.

Beyond identifying security issues, DAST's versatility extends to other critical areas such as load testing, DDoS defense testing, and generating edge cases for inputs like triggering integer overflow or divide-by-zero errors. It also plays a crucial role in scale testing, helping organizations gauge the infrastructure resources needed to support their applications.  This real world help manifests in tangible benefits and dollars to the users.

In my own interactions with the NightVision DAST tool, I have improved my web application saddlebagexchange.com by identifying numerous bottlenecks and infrastructure limitations simply by having a tool generate responses at scale.  This has helped me immensely in planning for future API scaling, database scaling, cloud infrastructure product comparisons and much more without even mentioning or tabulating the dozens of security vulnerabilities identified!

DAST's capability to identify harmful responses from third-party applications and find missing input validation within an API is particularly crucial in today's interconnected application ecosystems. DAST adeptly identifies complex vulnerabilities, such as bad headers or XSS reflection attack surfaces, which SAST might overlook. Moreover, when integrated with logging systems, DAST can trigger real-time security alerts for security review post mortems in a safe development or staging environment. This enhances the overall responsiveness of security testing to ensure bugs and vulnerabilities are caught before entering a production environment. The user gains confidence that a majority of the attack surface and potential security issues have been detected.

The advancements in the next generation DAST tools, exemplified by solutions like NightVision, eradicates the speed advantage that was once the sole domain of SAST. This evolution positions DAST not just as an equally efficient option time-wise but also as a more comprehensive and practical approach to application security.

‍

Conclusion

In the quest for robust application security, the combination of SAST and DAST provides a well-rounded strategy. While SAST offers a fast and basic security check of code, DAST brings a depth of analysis and practical testing that is indispensable in today's complex software environments. Embracing both methodologies allows organizations to not only identify potential vulnerabilities early but also to understand their real-world implications and effectively mitigate them.

‍